Thanks for Playing!

bird, new, square, twitter icon



Previous Columns
The Magnificent Marble Machine
The Better Sex
Hot Potato
The Challengers
Rhyme and Reason
Second Chance
Catch Phrase
Trump Card
Caesars Challenge
Just Men!
Hit Man
Wipeout (1988)
Strike It Rich
Break the Bank (1976)

Copyright Statement

No infringement of copyright is intended by these fan pages; production companies of shows this site covers retain all rights to the sounds, images, and information contained herein. No challenge to copyright is implied. 

Web design by Jason Elliott. Logo by Chico Alexander. 
Full Copyright Statement

Powered by 1&1 Internet

with Chris Wolvie
Nothing "Galactica" About It
February 2
These six celebrities are the (New)...

AIR DATES: October 26, 1981 to April 23, 1982 (original); April 4, 1983 to July 1, 1983 ("NEW")
CREATOR: Merrill Heatter
HOST: Alex Trebek
WATCH IT AT: (original); ("NEW") 

All good things must end. And, for Merrill Heatter and Bob Quigley, that happened in 1981 when Quigley retired, ending the production company the two created. But Heatter had a few more aces up his sleeve (and I ain't talking "Catch 21"). He basically took H&Q's most popular show, "Hollywood Squares", and changed the shape,...literally. Instead of having nine celebrities in squares, he put SIX into TRIANGLES. Everything else, he pretty much left the same; contestants still need to get three "triangles" to win, though not necessarily "in a row" and the celebs' answers (after they make a joke about it) needed to be "agreed" or "disagreed". But, instead of calling it "Celebrity Triangles" or the like, Heatter decided to try to cash-in on the sci-fi and video game crazes and call it "Battlestars". When NBC asked to bring it back to replace "Just Men", it was called "The NEW Battlestars". And, despite the familiar gameplay, upon re-living the show on YouTube, I think it would've been better if the Cylons had got to Heatter first.

Two players (including a returning champion) compete against each other. The main object of the game is to "capture" three "Battlestars". The board is six connected triangles (each containing a celebrity "Battlestar") with numbers 1 through 10 on the corners of the triangles. 

The champion starts with control. A light randomly flashes between the ten corners and the contestant in control stops it by hitting a button. The corner it stops on decides which Battlestar gets asked the question. If the corner touches more than one Battlestar, the contestant picks which one gets asked. The host then asks a question of the Battlestar who gives an answer. The contestant decides if they agree or disagree with the answer the Battlestar gives. If they choose right, they maintain control, the corner is blacked-out and removed from play and the contestant gets to CHOOSE the next numbered corner. If a right answer leads to all three corners of a Battlestar being blacked-out, the contestant "captures" that Battlestar and the celebrity is removed from further play. More than one Battlestar can be captured at the same time. The capturing is denoted by the Battlestar's background turning red or blue, depending on which contestant captured it. (IMPORTANT: a corner is actually blacked-out whether the contestant is right or wrong...EXCEPT in the case where it would lead to a capture; a contestant must EARN a capture.) If the contestant is wrong, they lose control to the other contestant and the random light starts up again.

When a contestant answers a question right that captures their third Battlestar, that contestant wins the game and is the champion. It is possible for the contestant to capture all six Battlestars; that person received a bonus prize or, later in the original run, $1000 cash.

Two different versions were used:
"BATTLESTARS 2": In the original version, the face of a famous person is hidden behind 16 numbered squares (in a 2-4-4-4-2 format). The champion picks three cards with codes on them. The host scans the codes in and the three squares they represent are removed. The champion then chooses one more square to remove. The champion then has one chance to identify the celebrity to win $5000. If they don't, they can draw three more cards, one at a time, and enlist help from the Battlestars themselves. Getting it right on the first extra card wins $3000, $2000 on the second and $1000 on the third. If they STILL don't get it, they PICK a square and guess for $500...and, if that fails, the champ gets a defaulted $250.

"THE MAIN EVENT": In the "NEW Battlestars", the champion chooses from the Battlestars they captured in the main game. The Battlestar is given a question with three possible answers (which, unlike the main game, were actually SPOKEN aloud). The Battlestar gives an answer they think is correct. The champion must then agree or disagree with the answer given. If they agree and is right, the champion "won" that Battlestar and $500. If they DISAGREE and is right, the contestant must then give the CORRECT answer to "win" the Battlestar. The round ends when a) the champion is incorrect, to which they only keep the money earned, or b) they "win" three Battlestars, which nets them the "Battlestar Bonanza" of $5000 in cash and at least $5000 in prizes, which are added to each day until hit.

A champion remains champion until they lose or they get twenty straight wins, which leads to retirement after their final bonus round. If a challenger doesn't get a chance to play in a game, they stay on for the next game (just like "Bullseye" and "Break the Bank").

What worked for "Hollywood Squares" worked for "Battlestars". And why wouldn't it? You have comedy, you have uncertainly, and you had the same way to win: get three stars. They way you GET the star is a little different still worked.

Personally, I didn't think the music and set worked...but, I have to admit, it does have the right aestetic for the early 80s. And, as stated, they were trying for a sci-fi/vid-game style for things...and damned if the music didn't harken to sci-fi shows of the time. Much like "Go", the music was made to hype people up for the show...and, begrudgingly, I'll admit it work.

The first bonus round sucked...but at least they made up for it in the "NEW" version. And kudos for not making it just "agree or disagree and win" for that; getting the actual ANSWER right was good, especially for the "Bonanza" they were playing for.

When making an HS clone, it's best to keep it simple. And making it so you have to get all three corners of a Battlestar to capture it...that only stays simple if someone keeps getting answers right. Once someone gets a question wrong, the "randomizing" of which corner is played next makes things more difficult. And that must've been TOO difficult for early-80s audiences; no WONDER it was cancelled TWICE.

Which begs the question of why it was even brought BACK? If it failed the first time, bringing it back with a different bonus game and not much else changed is NOT going to help matters. Want proof? The original run lasted 26 weeks. The "NEW" version (which wasn't really all that "new")? 13 WEEKS! Was NBC really THAT desperate?!

Maybe I'm just used to Alex Trebek being rather laid-back during his long run at "Jeopardy!" but...well, is it me or is he just WAY too loud in this game? I mean, don't get me wrong; he seemed close to the same in "Double Dare" (a GGB for another time) but...I don't remember him being this excitable. Not on "Double Dare", not on "High Rollers", not on "Classic Concentration". It's like he was a rookie who was over-enunciating everything, trying to make everything more exciting than it really he KNEW this was a bad concept.

One more thing: I know the original HS never showed the gap between the Squares and the contestants...but they almost made it look like they were in two different STUDIOS in this game.

Nope, nope, nope. As was proven here and in my next column, Heatter just CAN'T make a clone of HS. He had other interesting concepts, but remaking such a popular show with a slightly different board...not one of them.

NEXT TIME: From six...down to four.

Chris Wolvie always says, "By your command" to Chico.
Follow him on Twitter @ChrisWolvie and e-mail him at